Skip to main content

Free Music For Streamers (And Everyone Else) - Copyright, Public Domain, and The Commons

A comment on Alpha Gaming's discussion of copyright, relating to recent DCMA activity on the streaming site Twitch: "Why I Started My Own Record Label"

I'm surprised you didn't say anything about Creative Commons licensing (a specific kind of "some rights reserved" licensing similar to MIT and GPL), which uses all the proper legalese to prove those promises that you made regarding the music on your own label - and because all CC licenses are legally unrevokable, any rights a redistributor has to the music will only expand over time. Any issue that content creators may discover by using creative commons licensed works can also arise by using privately licensed work. The main issue seems to be when people redistribute content that isn't their creation or they don't have redistribution rights for sources/samples; and this can occur on any platform regardless of what license is used; for instance, consider most TV show streaming sites - they look legit, they charge you money, but when they get DCMAd you find out they were out for a quick buck. I've had something similar happen to me on a stock photo site, and that's one of the reasons I carefully read ToS of sites that provide content, and often refuse to use privately licensed material unless I know the content creator personally. In the cases where I'm basically expecting some corporation to come after a chunk of my pie no matter what I do, assuming I ever even get a pie (don't count your pies before they bake?), I'm not about to pay for the privilege.

IANAL but if you're looking for content to use in your videos that does not cost money, look for creative commons licensing that includes the terms
"derivative works allowed" (1) AND "commercial purposes allowed" (2),
OR "public domain" (aka CC-0, no rights reserved).

1: Videos where action is timed to music are legally defined as derivative works; videos with music playing in the background, to my knowledge, are not yet legally defined as anything at all; due to this, community praxis is to consider all videos that do not fall under "fair use" to be "derivative". 2: Streaming services make money from streamed and hosted content even if the streamer does not (remember, you are a product).

Make note of any "share-alike" content as you will need to use a CC-SA license for streams and VoDs containing content with that particular license; twitch in particular has exclusivity on videos released by affiliates and partners - if you have signed away the right to redistribute your own content then you do not have the rights necessary to release your content under a share-alike license at the time of initial posting; IANAL but this would violate the spirit of the share-alike license if not legally prohibit use of share-alike content entirely.

Also, these licenses can be recommended to indie musicians to protect both the musician and the content creators. Anything you declare as creative commons or public domain under the creative commons license, with a link to the creative commons legal text, is protected (from corporate control) by using those existing licenses. Creative commons and public domain licensing have legal documentation that states the license cannot be revoked and made more private; private licenses can often be revoked at any time. To reference the example used in the video, if an indie musician signs with a record label, the record label cannot legally copyright strike any music previously released under a creative commons license, as the right to restrict the license no longer belonged to the musician at the time of signing.

Here are the human-readable explanations of each license type, click on the license name to see the legal text that defines it.

Anything released under a creative commons license is properly licensed, rather than being copyright-free, which is why some people use the tongue-in-cheek term "copyleft" to refer to permissive licenses like these.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mitchiri Neko Mix, Mix 2, and Lab

TL:DR - found the correct archive for a game no longer on the Play Store. "Translation" note: I normally use double letters to represent the small-tsu character, but the Fan Wiki used a different romanization. Both are valid romanizations from different systems, although I believe the method I was taught is more modern. To respect the community, I will use the accepted standard of "Mitchiri Neko" for English/localized game titles, and to respect my own need for consistency I will use all-lowers "micchiri neko" for the pronounciation guide following Japanese characters. Also I apologise if my English is awkward at times, I'm not so good at Japanese that I can code-switch easily... polyglots and people who become bilingual later in life will confirm, learning a new language does something to the way you process the languages you already know, and most polyglots I know have to keep studying all of them to keep them straight - a bit like how, when you appl...

If all bitches are the same, then all men are trash.

Plenty of men say they hate women with no reaction. In popular music, they chant "all bitches the same." That's hate. Over the dinner table, they say "well she should have defended herself." That's hate. As a joke, they say "women exist only to make babies and sandwiches." That's hate. In the legislative office, they say "We can't allow females to have access to birth control because it encourages them to have sex." That's fucking hate. The only reason you even noticed a problem is because we turned those words around on you. "All men are trash." "If you can't control your sexual desires then you need to be kept on a leash." "Child support should start at conception." "Men should get their tubes tied until marriage." Do you, a man among men, know what happens when a woman says those words? Of course not, because you aren't that woman. But perhaps you have some idea - perhaps ...

Be aware of your surroundings, quarantine edition

One difficulty with online friendships is that a parent isn't as likely to have casual conversations with their child's friends as they carpool to school or have lunch at home, and a child isn't likely to have casual conversations with their friends' parents, meaning significant distortions in logic can develop by bouncing around the echo chamber of a teenage clique. Bigotry, like drain fungus, grows best when never confronted with personal relationships or at least unemotional logic. Many young people have been getting "red-pilled" by their online, low-responsibility relationships, private misogyny exploding into public violence without any indication of a trigger ... just like the parent of a child groomed for sexual exploitation, the parent of a person groomed for domestic terrorism never has any idea that it was going on.  To be clear, this is in no way intended to be a presentation of judgement, merely observation that there is a common dange...